Last Updated on June 19, 2022 by Quantified Trading
I record every trade I make in Excel. I categorize them into short/long, which day of the week, date, where the market opened, how the market performed the day before, how the stock performed the day before, average volume in the ticker, P/L in the ticker, and which strategy. My recommendation is to have a trading journal. For your convenience, I provided a trading journal example.
Of course, collecting this is very boring, but sometimes this is an invaluable tool.
This morning I discovered one pattern in one of my strategies that I don’t think is curve fitting:
Certain stocks/industries perform much better than the rest in this strategy. Looking at my numbers I discovered the following P/L diagram during the last 50 days (this is a day trading strategy. Ignore the numbers on the x-axis. P/L is on the y-axis):
- The win ratio per day is 67%
- The average win day is 693 USD
- The average losing day is 462 USD
Hence, the expected profit per day is 358 USD. This is actually very good. The size per position is just 5 000 USD and on average this strategy gives 29 fills per day (29 different stocks). This strategy trades both long and short every day. Backtesting this further back I get even better results (but the trading environment was better).
Different sectors have different patterns. Some tend to correlate more or less with the market (S&P 500), some don’t go with the market at all, others hardly move at all, etc. There are so many ways to trade. You have to keep looking for patterns that make logical sense. You can’t trade oil stocks the same way as you trade utilities.
Every morning I look at my numbers looking for patterns or looking for something that I have not tested before. Usually, nothing turns up, but the only way to make money is to keep looking.